JACKSON v. LEMMON et al
| MARSHALL JACKSON |
| DOC SCOTT BRENNEKE, DEPARTMENT RECORD COORDINATOR and BRUCE LEMMON |
| 1:2016cv02732 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER granting Defendant's 60 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and Directing Entry of Final Judgment. The Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Jackson has b een given ample opportunity to explain his claim. He was given the opportunity to amend and to supplement the amended complaint. Under these circumstances, dismissal of his federal claims with prejudice and without anopportunity to amend is warranted. (Copy to Defendant via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/18/2017. (JDC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Strike the defendant's affirmative defenses. The clerk is directed to update to reflect that the only defendants in this action are Bruce Lemmon and Scott Brenneke in their individual capacities. All other defendants are dismissed. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/12/2017 (dist made) (CBU)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
