REAVES v. ULLMAN et al
Plaintiff: KEVIN REAVES
Defendant: LT. COATS, WENDY KNIGHT, OFC MILLS and PAUL ULLMAN
Case Number: 1:2016cv02741
Filed: October 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Withdraw Affirmative Defense of Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies and Setting Pretrial Schedule. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 3/6/2017. (LDH)
December 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENTRY Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Service of Process - The clerk shall update the docket to terminate Paul Ullman as a defendant and add the Indiana Department of Correction as a defendant. The plaintiff's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims shall proceed against the Indiana Department of Correction. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the Indiana Department of Correction. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 12/5/2016. Copies sent pursuant to distribution list.(LDH)
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Entry Discussing Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Complaint, Discussing Misjoinder, and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 5] is granted to the extent that a collection order is b eing issued to collect the filing fee in monthly payments whenever the plaintiff's income permits. The plaintiff shall have through November 28, 2016, in which to file an amended complaint incorporating only properly related claims. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 11/3/2016. Copies mailed via US Mail to Plaintiff. (LDH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REAVES v. ULLMAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LT. COATS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFC MILLS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL ULLMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KEVIN REAVES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?