WANKO v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
| CATHERINE WANKO |
| BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY and INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY |
| 1:2016cv02789 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ENTRY on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order. For the foregoing reasons, Indiana University's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Filing No. 87 ), is GRANTED on all claims asserted by Wanko. Wanko's Objection to the Magistrate Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part an Extension of Discovery and Order Denying the Motion to Compel, (Filing No. 83 ), is OVERRULED, and her Corrected Motion to Defer or Deny Sum mary Judgment and/or Time to Conduct Discovery, and/or For Any Other Relief Pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Filing No. 92 ), is DENIED. The Court will issue Final Judgment under separate order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/30/2018. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 29 Motion to Dismiss - IUSD is dismissed as a party to this action. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/3/2017.(JRB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
