GATES v. COLE et al
| JOHN GATES |
| BUCKNER, COLE, DR CONDIS, V. HINSHAW, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRUCE LEMON, A MCCULLUGH, V. MESEDIC and DR NANCE |
| 1:2016cv02910 |
| October 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
Entry Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2 ] is granted. This is the claim the Court has identified as the most viable claim. If the plaintiff feels the Court h as overlooked or misstated his claim, he shall have through December 2, 2016, to notify the Court. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant Indiana Department of Correction in the manner specified b y Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed on October 26, 2016, [dkt. 1], applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk is instructed to terminate the defendants from the docket and substitute the Indiana Department of Correction as the defendant. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 11/3/2016. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list.(LDH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
