KETTERBURG v. LAYTON

KETTERBURG v. LAYTON

Plaintiff:	ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KETTERBURG
Defendant:	JOHN R. LAYTON
Case Number:	1:2016cv02926
Filed:	October 27, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 31, 2016	Filing 4 Entry Denying In Forma Pauperis Status, Discussing Complaint, And Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is denied without prejudice because the motion ontains no information relati ng to the plaintiff's income, resources, and expenses. He shall have through November 28, 2016, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court, or renew his request to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting in formation. The plaintiff shall have through November 28, 2016, in which to either a) file an amended complaint that states viable federal civil claim, or b) show cause why this action should ot be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Failure to do so will result in the action eing dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/31/2016.(JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 31, 2016

Filing 4 Entry Denying In Forma Pauperis Status, Discussing Complaint, And Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is denied without prejudice because the motion ontains no information relati ng to the plaintiff's income, resources, and expenses. He shall have through November 28, 2016, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court, or renew his request to proceed in forma pauperis with supporting in formation. The plaintiff shall have through November 28, 2016, in which to either a) file an amended complaint that states viable federal civil claim, or b) show cause why this action should ot be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Failure to do so will result in the action eing dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/31/2016.(JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KETTERBURG v. LAYTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KETTERBURG
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN R. LAYTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?