MERRITT v. WIEMER ET AL
OMAR MERRITT |
LOTOYA CHERRY, SERGEANT HOSKING, STANLEY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OFFICER WALLCE and OFFICER A WIEMER |
1:2016cv02927 |
October 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Matthew P. Brookman |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Entry Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Omar Merritt, an inmate of the Miami Correctional Facility, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that certain correctional officers exercised excessive force against him while he was incarcerated at the Putnamville Correctional Facility. the excessive force claim against defendant Weimer and the failure to protect claim against defendant Hoskins shall proceed. All other claims are dismissed and the clerk shall terminate all other defendants on the docket. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Officer A. Wiemer and Sergeant Hoskins in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Proces s shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copies to parties pursuant to the distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/7/2016.(BRR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.