EPPERLY v. HOWARD COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER et al
WILLIAM EPPERLY |
JEFFREY BRACKETT, JUSTIN CHRISTMAS, HOWARD COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, STEVE ROGERS and ANDREA STONESTREET |
1:2016cv03005 |
November 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Entry Assessing Initial Partial Filing Fee, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2 ] is granted. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fo rty-One Dollars and Ten Cents ($41.10). He shall have through December 9, 2016, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The dismissal however is without prejudice and Mr. Epperly shall have through December 9, 2016, in whic h to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. If the plaintiff fails to show cause or seek leave to amend the complaint so that it states a claim upon which relief can be granted, the action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth in this Entry without further notice. (See entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/09/2016. (JLS) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/10/2016) (JLS). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.