SCALES v. VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District SCALES v. VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING et al

SCALES v. VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING et al

Plaintiff:	JAMES W. SCALES
Defendant:	COMMUNITY BUILDERS and VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING
Case Number:	1:2016cv03047
Filed:	November 8, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 10, 2016	Filing 5 Entry Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 4 ] is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing ruling, the plaintiff still owes the filing fee. The plaintiff's request for attorney assistance states that the plaintiff would like help with the legal process or mediation. This request [dkt. 2 ] is denied without prejudice as premature. The plaintiff may renew his request after the defendants have answered or otherwise responded to the com plaint. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (See entry.) Copy to Plaintiff and Defendant via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/10/2016. (JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 10, 2016

Filing 5 Entry Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 4 ] is granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing ruling, the plaintiff still owes the filing fee. The plaintiff's request for attorney assistance states that the plaintiff would like help with the legal process or mediation. This request [dkt. 2 ] is denied without prejudice as premature. The plaintiff may renew his request after the defendants have answered or otherwise responded to the com plaint. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (See entry.) Copy to Plaintiff and Defendant via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/10/2016. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCALES v. VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: COMMUNITY BUILDERS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: VILLAGE OF MILLS CROSSING
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES W. SCALES
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?