COLE v. PERRY

COLE v. PERRY

Plaintiff:	GERALD COLE
Defendant:	JAMES PERRY
Case Number:	1:2016cv03081
Filed:	November 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 22, 2019	Filing 203 ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS - For the reasons set forth, the Defendants' motion to reconsider, Dkt. No. 195 , is GRANTED to the extent that the Court has considered the Defendants' arguments as set forth above, but DENIED i n all other aspects. Both parties' motions in limine, Dkt. Nos. 171 and 179 , and their objections, Dkt. Nos. 185 and 187 , are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the Plaintiff's objections to Defendants' Exhibits 1-6 and 27, including the Plaintiff's additional filing regarding Exhibit 1, Dkt. No. 200 , by May 29, 2019. The Court also ORDERS that the Defendants file Exhibit 27 by May 29, 2019. The Plaintiff is ORDERED, by M ay 29, 2019, to file a response to the following objections regarding: (1) Dr. Jesse Savage, Dr. Michael Guzman, and Dr. Hristos Kaimatkliotis testifying by deposition; (2) the testimony of Lin Smith; (3) the testimony of Chief Bryan Roach; (4) Pla intiff's Exhibits 5 and 6; (5) Exhibits 7,8, and 9; (6) Exhibits 12, 13, and 14; (7) Exhibit 15; (8) Exhibit 22; (9) Exhibit 23-33; and (10) Exhibit 36. Regarding Chief Bryan Roach, the Plaintiff is specifically ORDERED to provide the nature o f Chief Roach's intended testimony. Regarding Exhibits 5 and 6, the Plaintiff is specifically ORDERED to explain the exhibits' relevance and how a proper foundation for them will be established at trial. Finally, the Court ORDERS that the Defendants file, by May 24, 2019, a proposed stipulation detailing the convictions they would seek to introduce should the proposed witnesses testify. This proposed stipulation should comply with Federal Rule of Evidence 609, and include the na ture of the conviction and the date of the witness's conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later. The Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to the Defendants' proposed stipulation by May 29, 2019. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/22/2019. (JDC)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 22, 2019

Filing 203 ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS - For the reasons set forth, the Defendants' motion to reconsider, Dkt. No. 195 , is GRANTED to the extent that the Court has considered the Defendants' arguments as set forth above, but DENIED i n all other aspects. Both parties' motions in limine, Dkt. Nos. 171 and 179 , and their objections, Dkt. Nos. 185 and 187 , are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the Plaintiff's objections to Defendants' Exhibits 1-6 and 27, including the Plaintiff's additional filing regarding Exhibit 1, Dkt. No. 200 , by May 29, 2019. The Court also ORDERS that the Defendants file Exhibit 27 by May 29, 2019. The Plaintiff is ORDERED, by M ay 29, 2019, to file a response to the following objections regarding: (1) Dr. Jesse Savage, Dr. Michael Guzman, and Dr. Hristos Kaimatkliotis testifying by deposition; (2) the testimony of Lin Smith; (3) the testimony of Chief Bryan Roach; (4) Pla intiff's Exhibits 5 and 6; (5) Exhibits 7,8, and 9; (6) Exhibits 12, 13, and 14; (7) Exhibit 15; (8) Exhibit 22; (9) Exhibit 23-33; and (10) Exhibit 36. Regarding Chief Bryan Roach, the Plaintiff is specifically ORDERED to provide the nature o f Chief Roach's intended testimony. Regarding Exhibits 5 and 6, the Plaintiff is specifically ORDERED to explain the exhibits' relevance and how a proper foundation for them will be established at trial. Finally, the Court ORDERS that the Defendants file, by May 24, 2019, a proposed stipulation detailing the convictions they would seek to introduce should the proposed witnesses testify. This proposed stipulation should comply with Federal Rule of Evidence 609, and include the na ture of the conviction and the date of the witness's conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later. The Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to the Defendants' proposed stipulation by May 29, 2019. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/22/2019. (JDC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLE v. PERRY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: GERALD COLE
Represented By:	Richard A. Waples
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES PERRY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?