TOKIO MARINE HCC et al v. DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
| CITY OF COLUMBUS, INDIANA and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC and FREIGHTLINER, LLC |
| 1:2016cv03210 |
| November 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Richard L. Young |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. Specifically, Plaintiffs' failure to warn claim is the only remaining claim for trial; denying Plaintiffs' 91 Motion to exclude the opinions of John Maurus; and granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 93 motion to exclude the opinions of David Zedonis. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/28/2018. (TMD)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 49 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 7/21/2017. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 47 Report and Recommendations, 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, FREIGHTLINER, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/7/2017.(RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
