ROSE v. FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC

ROSE v. FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC

Plaintiff:	MARY ROSE
Defendant:	FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC
Case Number:	1:2016cv03212
Filed:	November 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 19, 2019	Filing 64 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS - Franciscan's Bill of Costs (Filing No. 59 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court reduces Franciscan's modified request for costs in the amount of $9,023.15 by $3,630.44, and awards Franciscan $5,392.71 in reasonable and necessary costs incurred in this litigation. The Clerk is directed to tax costs against Plaintiff Mary Rose in favor of Franciscan in the amount of $5,392.71. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/19/2019.(NAD)
June 4, 2018	Filing 57 ORDER - granting 35 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 by Defendant Franciscan Alliance, Inc. ("Franciscan&qu ot;) (Filing No. 35 ). Franciscan is a network of hospitals and health care providers, serving patients in Indiana and Illinois. Plaintiff Mary Rose ("Rose") is an employee of Franciscan, who was denied a new position at one of Francisc an's hospitals in central Indiana. After Rose was not offered the new position, and she initiated this lawsuit asserting a claim for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 ("AD A"). Franciscan filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, asserting that Rose was not a qualified individual, and there is no evidence of discrimination on the basis of disability. Defendant Franciscan Alliance, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 35 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Mary Rose's ADA claim is dismissed. Final judgment will issue under separate order. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/4/2018. (NAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 19, 2019

Filing 64 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS - Franciscan's Bill of Costs (Filing No. 59 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court reduces Franciscan's modified request for costs in the amount of $9,023.15 by $3,630.44, and awards Franciscan $5,392.71 in reasonable and necessary costs incurred in this litigation. The Clerk is directed to tax costs against Plaintiff Mary Rose in favor of Franciscan in the amount of $5,392.71. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/19/2019.(NAD)

June 4, 2018

Filing 57 ORDER - granting 35 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 by Defendant Franciscan Alliance, Inc. ("Franciscan&qu ot;) (Filing No. 35 ). Franciscan is a network of hospitals and health care providers, serving patients in Indiana and Illinois. Plaintiff Mary Rose ("Rose") is an employee of Franciscan, who was denied a new position at one of Francisc an's hospitals in central Indiana. After Rose was not offered the new position, and she initiated this lawsuit asserting a claim for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 ("AD A"). Franciscan filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, asserting that Rose was not a qualified individual, and there is no evidence of discrimination on the basis of disability. Defendant Franciscan Alliance, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 35 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Mary Rose's ADA claim is dismissed. Final judgment will issue under separate order. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/4/2018. (NAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROSE v. FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC
Represented By:	Nicholas Scott Johnston
Represented By:	Dana Eugene Stutzman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARY ROSE
Represented By:	Christopher S. Wolcott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?