ATKINS v. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES OF COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH et al
| JAY ATKINS, III |
| BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES OF COMMUNITY HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH, ERIKA C. CORNETT and JHON FRANCIS SHULTZ |
| 1:2016cv03352 |
| December 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
Entry Granting In Forma Pauperis Status, Dismissing Complaint, And Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2] is granted. Notwithstanding this ruling, the plaintiff still owes the $35 0.00 filing fee. For the above reasons, the complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Mr. Atkins shall have through January 20, 2017, in which to either show cause why judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue or t o identify a viable claim which was not considered by the Court in this Entry. If the plaintiff fails to show cause or seek leave to amend, the action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/15/2016.(JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
