BEY et al v. KOSSACK et al
| YONTIM BEY |
| ROBERT E. DITTMER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and ANDREW KOSSACK |
| ANTHONY J. MINNEY, SR. |
| 1:2017cv00315 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ENTRY Dismissing Complaint and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - This Matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Yontim Bey's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for screening. The Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed wit hout prepaying fees or costs [dkt. 2 ] is granted. For the reasons explained above, the complaint fails to survive the screening required by § 1915 (e) because it fails to contain a legally viable claim against the defendants. Given the nature of the claims no opportunity to amend is warranted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/3/2017. (JLS) Modified on 2/3/2017 (JLS).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
