KOORSEN et al v. BRIAN FULLER INSURANCE CO. et al
| JAMES A. KOORSEN, JR. and TERESA L. KOORSEN |
| ALLSTATE -- THOMAS BRAND AGENCY and BRIAN FULLER INSURANCE CO. |
| 1:2017cv00439 |
| February 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Entry Discussing Motion and Notice of Conflict of Interest, Dismissing Action, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - In his complaint, the plaintiff alleges that his insurance agent submitted a claim without his consent for damage allegedly caused by Direct TV. Because this claim does not allege a violation of federal law and the plaintiff did not allege diversity of citizenship, the Court noted in the Entry of February 14, 2017, that it did not have jurisdiction over the plaintiff's claim. Dkt. 4 . The plaintiff was directed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.The plaintiff has not shown that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claim. Accordingly, the action is dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Entry of February 14, 2017. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/13/2017. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
