KOORSEN et al v. TARTER REALITY & APPRAISALS et al
| JAMES A. KOORSEN, JR. and TERESA L. KOORSEN |
| BRODY TARTER, MATHEW TARTER and TARTER REALITY & APPRAISALS |
| 1:2017cv00440 |
| February 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ENTRY Directing Entry of Final Judgment - This Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the claims presented and final judgment dismissing this civil action shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/28/2017.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
4
Entry Granting In Forma Pauperis Status, Dismissing Teresa Koorsen as Plaintiff, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [dkt. 2 ] is granted. The clerk shall update the docket to reflect th at James Koorsen is the only plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have through March 17, 2017, in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond to this order to show cause will result in the dismissal of the action for lack of jurisdiction without further notice. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/16/2017. (JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
