BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
Petitioner: JAMES D. BRISCOE
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneous: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2017cv00496
Filed: February 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Entry Discussing Habeas Petition and Directing Further Proceedings - Before the Court is petitioner James Briscoe's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding identified as No. IYC-16-11-0009. In that pr oceeding, Mr. Briscoe was found guilty of Possession of a Cell Phone. One of his claims is that he was denied the ability to defend himself against the charges, which violated his due process rights. Although it appears that Mr. Briscoe's due process right to notice of the charges against him was violated, because neither party adequately addressed this issue, this action shall proceed as follows. The respondent has through November 27, 2017, in which to either: (1) file a supplementa l brief addressing the issue of notice and withholding the confidential investigation report that specifically confronts the above authorities and assessment of the record; or (2) vacate the disciplinary sanctions against Mr. Briscoe and set the d isciplinary matter for re-hearing after adequate notice of the charge is given. If the respondent chooses to file a supplemental brief, the petitioner will have twenty-one days (21 days) from the date the brief is filed in which to file a supplemental reply brief. If the respondent vacates the sanctions, the respondent shall notify the Court by way of a motion to dismiss this action as moot. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/27/2017.(APD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRISCOE v. KNIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES D. BRISCOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Represented By: Frances Hale Barrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?