MENDIOLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MENDIOLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Petitioner:	JESUS MENDIOLA
Respondent:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	1:2017cv00688
Filed:	March 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2018	Filing 11 Entry Discussing Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Mendiola has failed to show that he is entitled to the relief he seeks. His motion for re lief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in No. 1:03-cr-0056-LJM-KPF-1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) o f the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court finds that Mr. Mendiola has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/7/2018. (Copy mailed to Petitioner) (MEJ)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2018

Filing 11 Entry Discussing Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Mendiola has failed to show that he is entitled to the relief he seeks. His motion for re lief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in No. 1:03-cr-0056-LJM-KPF-1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) o f the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court finds that Mr. Mendiola has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/7/2018. (Copy mailed to Petitioner) (MEJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MENDIOLA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JESUS MENDIOLA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?