HENMAN ENGINEERING AND MACHINE, INC. et al v. JD NORMAN MUNCIE, LLC, et al.
Plaintiff: THOMAS HENMAN, JR, THOMAS HENMAN, SR and HENMAN ENGINEERING AND MACHINE, INC.
Defendant: JD NORMAN MUNCIE BUILDING, LLC, JD NORMAN MUNCIE, LLC, JD NORMAN WINCHESTER BUILDING, LLC, JD NORMAN WINCHESTER, LLC and JUSTIN D NORMAN
Case Number: 1:2017cv00701
Filed: March 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 138 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL ; In accordance with these findings of facts and conclusions of law, the Court rules in favor Plaintiffs and against Defendant on Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim. The Court fu rther finds against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiffs on Defendant's four breach of contract counterclaims as well as Defendant's unjust enrichment claim. *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/4/2020. Copy Mailed.(CKM)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER denying 113 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Copy sent to Defendant via USPS. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/13/2020. (LDH)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY: The Court grants Defendants' motion to amend their counterclaim [Filing No. 59 ], and denies Defendants' motion to stay and compel review by an independent accounting firm. [Filing No. 60 .] Defendants shall file and serve their amended counterclaim wi thin seven days of the date of this order. The parties shall file a joint motion within 14 days proposing a timeline for any additional discovery related to the amended complaint. See Order for addition information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/11/2018. (SWM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HENMAN ENGINEERING AND MACHINE, INC. et al v. JD NORMAN MUNCIE, LLC, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS HENMAN, JR
Represented By: Matthew L. Kelsey
Represented By: Scott E. Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS HENMAN, SR
Represented By: Matthew L. Kelsey
Represented By: Scott E. Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HENMAN ENGINEERING AND MACHINE, INC.
Represented By: Matthew L. Kelsey
Represented By: Scott E. Shockley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JD NORMAN MUNCIE BUILDING, LLC
Represented By: Matthew K. Giffin
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Huelskamp
Represented By: William C. O'Neil
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JD NORMAN MUNCIE, LLC
Represented By: Matthew K. Giffin
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Huelskamp
Represented By: William C. O'Neil
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JD NORMAN WINCHESTER BUILDING, LLC
Represented By: Matthew K. Giffin
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Huelskamp
Represented By: William C. O'Neil
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JD NORMAN WINCHESTER, LLC
Represented By: Matthew K. Giffin
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Huelskamp
Represented By: William C. O'Neil
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUSTIN D NORMAN
Represented By: Matthew K. Giffin
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Huelskamp
Represented By: William C. O'Neil
Represented By: Daniel Ryan Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?