HOSSTETLER et al v. VAUGHN et al
SHARA B HOSTETLER |
CITY OF SOUTHPORT, JASON SWANSON and THOMAS L VAUGHN |
1:2017cv00708 |
March 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' 39 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 39 ) is GRANTED. Summary judgment is granted on Shara's Fourth Amendment claims against Southport, Chief Vaughn, and Swanson, and on the claim for defamation against Southport, Chief Vaughn, and Swanson, and all claims are dismissed. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/25/2019. (NAD) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. It is granted as to Shara Hostetler's malicious prosecution claim. It is denied as to her federal claims against Chief Vaughn, in his offi cial capacity, Swanson, in his individual capacity, the Monell claim against the City of Southport, and a state law claim for defamation. Shara Hostetler's illegal search claim also remains pending. She has withdrawn her state law claims for trespass, negligence, false arrest, and intentional infliction of emotional distress so those claims are dismissed with prejudice. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2018. (MAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.