WALTON v. BERRYHILL

WALTON v. BERRYHILL

Plaintiff:	SAMANTHA K. WALTON
Defendant:	NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneous:	SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number:	1:2017cv00763
Filed:	March 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2017	Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/4/2017.(JRB)
August 23, 2017	Filing 16 * PLEASE DISREGARD DOCKETED ON WRONG DOCKET * ENTRY Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Once convicted and after exhaustion or waiver of any right to appeal, a defendant is presumed to stand "fairly and finally convicted." United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 164 (1982). For the reasons explained in this Entry, the effort of Weston Beldon to show otherwise with respect to his Morgan County convictions fails. H is petition for a writ of habeas corpus will therefore be denied. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. See Entry for additional information. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/23/2017.(SWM) Modified on 8/23/2017 (SWM).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2017

Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/4/2017.(JRB)

August 23, 2017

Filing 16 *** PLEASE DISREGARD DOCKETED ON WRONG DOCKET *** ENTRY Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Once convicted and after exhaustion or waiver of any right to appeal, a defendant is presumed to stand "fairly and finally convicted." United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 164 (1982). For the reasons explained in this Entry, the effort of Weston Beldon to show otherwise with respect to his Morgan County convictions fails. H is petition for a writ of habeas corpus will therefore be denied. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. See Entry for additional information. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/23/2017.(SWM) Modified on 8/23/2017 (SWM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WALTON v. BERRYHILL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Miscellaneous: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA K. WALTON
Represented By:	Charles D. Hankey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?