TEAGUE v. DOE et al
DEXTER RAMONE TEAGUE |
JOHN DOE |
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA |
1:2017cv00890 |
March 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ENTRY - Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment; The defendants moved for summary judgment. Mr. Teague responded with a motion to dismiss summary judgment. Because that filing is a response to t he defendants' motion for summary judgment, the clerk is directed to administratively terminate the motion at dkt. 52. For the reasons explained below, the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dkt 49 , is granted. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/2/2019. Copy Mailed. (CKM) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying as futile Plaintiff's 30 Motion To Amend Complaint. For these reasons, the plaintiff cannot add the additional defendants to this action. Only the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference policy and practice c laim against CCA identified in this Court's screening entry, Dkt. No. 7 , shall proceed. This defendant has already been served and has appeared in this action. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/30/2017. (JDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.