HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. et al v. DJO GLOBAL, INC. et al
| HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. and STRYKER CORPORATION |
| BRAD BOLINGER, TIM BROECKER, JUSTIN DAVIS, DJO GLOBAL, INC., JAKE EISTERHOLD, ERIC HUEBNER and KYWIN SUPERNAW |
| 1:2017cv00938 |
| March 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
239
ORDER on Discovery Dispute. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/5/2018.(SWM)
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER ON TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE - The parties appeared by counsel for a telephonic status conference on September 6, 2018, regarding a discovery dispute concerning text messages to and from Matt Long, a Plaintiff Howmedica employee. **SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/7/2018.(MGG)
|
|
Filing
228
MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker: Status Conference held on 6/14/2018 regarding a discovery dispute. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. (ADH)
|
|
Filing
101
OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 3/27/17. (cm, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 3/28/2017.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
