SANGSTER v. SUPERINTENDENT
| BRENT SANGSTER |
| SUPERINTENDENT |
| PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv00941 |
| March 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
Entry Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - The petition of Brent Sangster for a writ of habeas corpus challenges prison disciplinary proceeding number IYC 17-02-0021. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Sangster's habeas petition is denied. Relief is denied on the assertion that the hearing officer was biased. Habeas corpus is denied on the sufficiency of the evidence aspect of Mr. Sangster's first ground for relief. Ground t wo also presents a sufficiency of the evidence claim, asserting in different wording the same contentions presented in ground one. For same reasons, therefore, ground two is denied. Ground three is also denied. All three of Mr. Sangster's gro unds for habeas corpus relief are meritless and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied. There was no arbitrary action in any aspect of the charge, disciplinary proceedings, or sanctions involved in the events identified in t his action, and there was no constitutional infirmity in the proceeding which entitles Mr. Sangster to the relief he seeks. Mr. Sangster's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and this action is dismissed. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/14/2018.(APD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
