GIBSON v. INDIANA STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT et al
| JESSICA A. GIBSON |
| BRUCE BAXTER, JOHN F. BAYSE, MATTHEW A. BROWN, JON DARROW, INDIANA STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT and BRUCE LEMMON |
| 1:2017cv01212 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Dkt. 99 . Ms. Gibson's cross-motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Dkt. 110 . The only remaining claims are (1 ) an FMLA interference claim against ISPD, and (2) deprivation-of-liberty and equal-protection claims via section 1983 against Defendants Darrow, Bayse, Baxter, and Brown. Ms. Gibson SHALL HAVE through May 22, 2020 to respond why the Court should not enter summary judgment for Defendants on her deprivation-of-liberty and equal-protection claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). Defendant Lemmon is DISMISSED; the clerk shall update the docket accordingly. (See Order). Copy to Jessica A. Gibson via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 4/21/2020. (JDH)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 91 Motion to Compel. See Order. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 6/7/2019. (SWM) Modified on 6/7/2019 (SWM).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PARTDEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - Defendants' motion for partial dismissal for failure to state a claim, dkt. 53 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: Plaintiff's FMLA interference cla im IS DISMISSED as to Defendants Baxter, Brown, Darrow, and Lemmon. Plaintiff's FMLA retaliation claim IS DISMISSED as to Defendants Baxter and Brown. Plaintiff's ADA and Title VII claims ARE DISMISSED to the extent they are agains t any of the individual defendants. Plaintiff's Indiana Code Title 22 claim IS DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Title VII claim IS DISMISSED to the extent it seeks punitive damages against a government agency; Plaintiff's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims ARE DISMISSED to the extent they seek punitive damages; and Plaintiff's FMLA claims ARE DISMISSED to the extent they seek emotional or punitive damages. Defendants' motion to dismiss is otherwise DENIED. Defendants SHALL RESPOND to the remaining claims in Plaintiff's second amended complaint within fourteen days of this order (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/8/2019. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 73 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/11/2018 (dist made) (CBU)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss - SEE ENTRY. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend her Amended Complaint. (copy mailed). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/12/2017. (TMD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
