BALLHEIMER v. BATTS et al
JEFFREY C. BALLHEIMER |
DENNIS R. ANDERSON, RYAN BATTS, MATTHEW BURKS, BLAYNE ROOT and TOWN OF WHITESTOWN, INDIANA |
1:2017cv01393 |
May 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL - Plaintiff's Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1292(b), Dkt. 112 , is denied. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/21/2020. (JDH) |
Filing 107 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 87] is denied in part and granted in part. Defendants motion is granted in full with respect to the individual defendants, but denied with respect to the Monell claim. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 93] is denied. (See Order). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/20/2020. (MAC) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant's 60 Motion for Oral Argument; denying Plaintiff's 61 Motion to Strike Defendants' Surreply. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/18/2019. (MAC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.