HOSTETLER v. CITY OF SOUTHPORT, ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al

Plaintiff: MARC HOSTETLER
Defendant: CITY OF SOUTHPORT, JASON SWANSON and THOMAS L. VAUGHN
Case Number: 1:2017cv01564
Filed: May 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2019 Filing 57 ENTRY - GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 39 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Marc has not raised any material fact calling into question the officers' belief that they had probable cause to request the search warrants or to arrest him, and he is un able to state a constitutional violation as required by § 1983 or state a claim for state false arrest. For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 39) is GRANTED. Summary judgment is granted on all the claims, and this action is dismissed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/25/2019. (NAD)
March 27, 2018 Filing 34 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Filing No. 12 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted as to Marc&#0 39;s claim against Chief Vaughn in his official capacity. It is denied as to Marc's federal claims against Chief Vaughn, in his individual capacity, Swanson, in his individual capacity, and the Monell claim against Southport. Marc's illegal search and false arrest claims also remain pending as Southport did not move for judgment on those claims. Marc has withdrawn his state law claims for trespass, negligence, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, so those claims are dismissed with prejudice. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2018. (MAT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOSTETLER v. CITY OF SOUTHPORT, ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF SOUTHPORT
Represented By: R. Jeffrey Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON SWANSON
Represented By: R. Jeffrey Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS L. VAUGHN
Represented By: R. Jeffrey Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARC HOSTETLER
Represented By: Jeffrey S. McQuary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?