COCHRAN v. USA

COCHRAN v. USA

Petitioner:	JAMES F. COCHRAN
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2017cv01569
Filed:	May 12, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2018	Filing 20 Order Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons discussed in this Order, the motion of James F. Cochran for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Cochran is not entitled to relief on his § 2255 motion. There was no ineffect ive assistance of counsel, no errors in the sentencing proceedings or calculations, and no judicial misconduct. Accordingly, his motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent w ith this Entry shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in No. 1:11-cr-00042-JMS-DML-2. For the reasons stated in this Entry, the Court denies a certificate of appealability. (SEE ENTRY). Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/16/2018.(APD)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 16, 2018

Filing 20 Order Denying Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons discussed in this Order, the motion of James F. Cochran for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Cochran is not entitled to relief on his § 2255 motion. There was no ineffect ive assistance of counsel, no errors in the sentencing proceedings or calculations, and no judicial misconduct. Accordingly, his motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent w ith this Entry shall now issue and a copy of this Entry shall be docketed in No. 1:11-cr-00042-JMS-DML-2. For the reasons stated in this Entry, the Court denies a certificate of appealability. (SEE ENTRY). Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/16/2018.(APD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COCHRAN v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES F. COCHRAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?