GARDNER et al v. PAUL BISKER CONTRACTING, INC. et al
| DIANE HERRON and DAVID GARDNER |
| PAUL BISKER, PAUL BISKER CONTRACTING, INC. and KYLE R. TOM, II |
| 1:2017cv01968 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT - Plaintiffs therefore SHALL SUPPLEMENT their motion by December 20, 2019, addressing the issues identified in this order (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/27/2019.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Plaintiffs David Gardner and Diane Herron filed this lawsuit after a home they were having built was not completed. They have moved for partial summary judgment against the builde r, Paul Bisker Contracting, Inc., dkt. 55 , which has not appeared in this case. Mr. Gardner and Ms. Herron's motion for partial summary judgment, dkt. 55 , is GRANTED. The Court ACCEPTS the joint stipulation regarding Mr. Gardner and Ms. Herron's motion for partial summary judgment. Dkt. 60 . (See Order). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/27/2019. (JDH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
