BUFORD v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC. et al
Plaintiff: INDINAR BUFORD
Defendant: CASTLETON PARK INDIANAPOLIS MANAGEMENT, LLC, CASTLETON PARK INDIANAPOLIS, LP, CORPORATE CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC., CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC. and KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2017cv02125
Filed: June 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER granting Defendants Cushman & Wakefield, CPI, and CPIM's 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Cushman & Wakefield's 92 Motion to Strike. See Order. No judgment shall issue at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 11/9/2018. (SWM)
November 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Leave to File-CCS is given seven days from the date of this order to file an answer or other response and denying 30 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 11/30/2017. (CBU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BUFORD v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INDINAR BUFORD
Represented By: Michael John Woody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CASTLETON PARK INDIANAPOLIS MANAGEMENT, LLC
Represented By: Nicholas Gene Brunette
Represented By: Houston Hum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CASTLETON PARK INDIANAPOLIS, LP
Represented By: Nicholas Gene Brunette
Represented By: Houston Hum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORPORATE CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC.
Represented By: Nicholas Gene Brunette
Represented By: Houston Hum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?