NAYLOR v. TALBOT et al
JOHN NAYLOR |
DUANE ALSIP and PAUL TALBOT |
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) |
1:2017cv02380 |
July 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 Entry Denying Motion for Leave to Amend Presently before the Court is the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. For the reasons explained below, the motion to amend, dkt 33 , is denied. The plaintiff filed the presently p ending motion for leave to file an amended complaint after the deadline passed on February 15, 2018. The plaintiff claims that not "amending the complaint would be a tragedy." Dkt. 33 at 2. He asserts that the proposed amended complaint is much easier to read and in compliance with court rules. The plaintiff does not state in his motion that he is seeking to add new claims. These are all new claims that should have been raised by the December 26, 2017 deadline, therefore, the motion to file an amended complaint, dkt. 33 is denied. Nothing in this Entry prohibits the plaintiff from raising these claims in a new civil action. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/2/2018. (NAD) |
Filing 11 Entry Screening Complaint, Dismissing Certain Claims and Directing Further Proceedings - First, claims against Duane Alsip must be dismissed because the allegations asserted against him do not implicate a constitutional right. The allegations agains t defendant Dr. Paul Talbot are sufficient to allege that Dr. Talbot was deliberately indifferent to Mr. Naylor's serious medical needs: specifically, his need for a bottom bunk and range pass and the ability to carry his Imodium and acid reflux medications. These allegations implicate Mr. Naylor's Eighth Amendment rights. These claims shall proceed as submitted and the Court will consider if Mr. Naylor is entitled to injunctive relief regarding cell placement and the ability to carry medications, as well as, money damages. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant Dr. Paul Talbot in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed on July 13, 2017, app licable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/15/2017. (Copy mailed to Dr. Paul Talbot and Douglas Bitner) (MEJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.