COLLIER
| ANTONIO THOMAS COLLIER |
| MARK GARRAD |
| CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL - CIC (Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv02835 |
| August 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Amend the Complaint and denying 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/7/2017. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Eighty-Four Cents ($9.84). He shall ha ve through September 19, 2017, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The Clerk is directed to include a form motion for assistance recruiting counsel along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. If the plaintiff files this form, the Court will reconsider the plaintiff's request. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant Mark Garrad in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) electronically. Copies to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/23/2017. (MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
