INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al v. LAWSON et al
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF INDIANA |
| J. BRADLEY KING, CONNIE LAWSON and ANGELA NUSSMEYER |
| INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE |
| 1:2017cv02897 |
| August 23, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973 gg-2 Nat'l. Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 134 ) and GRANTS the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summa ry Judgment (Filing No. 136 ). The Court ISSUES A PERMANENT INJUNCTION prohibiting the Defendants from implementing SEA 334 §§ 5.5(d)(f) and prohibiting the Defendants from otherwise removing any Indiana registrant from the list of eli gible voters because of a change in residence absent: (1) a request or confirmation in writing directly from the voter that the voter is ineligible or does not wish to be registered; or (2) the NVRA- prescribed process of (a) notifying the voter, ( b) giving the voter an opportunity to respond, and (c) then waiting two inactive federal election cycles. The trial and final pretrial conference are hereby VACATED. Final judgment will issue under separate order and all other pending motions are terminated. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/20/2020.(NAD)
|
|
Filing
78
ENTRY - DENYING DEFENDANTS' 72 MOTION FOR STAY OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AND DISCOVERY. The Court DENIES the Defendants' Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings and Discovery, (Filing No. 72 ), while the case is on interlocutory appeal of the preliminary injunction order, presently before the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/5/2018. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER - granting Plaintiffs' 41 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Because each of the factors for the issuance of a preliminary injunction weighs in favor of Plaintiffs, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filing No. 41). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), the Court ISSUES A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION prohibiting the Defendants from taking any actions to implement SEA 442 until this case has been finally resolved. A similar ruling is issued in related case Common Cause Indiana v. Lawson et al., 1:17-cv-3936-TWP-MPB. Plaintiffs need not post a bond. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/8/2018. (NAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
