PRATT v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
| LEE PRATT |
| CORECIVIC, INC., JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, JANE SMITH and JOHN SMITH |
| 1:2017cv02948 |
| August 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS - This Order amends Filing No. 32 in order to accurately reflect that only Mr. Pratt's § 1983 claim is dismissed. Pending before the Court is Defendant Marion County Sheriff' s Office's (the "Sheriff's Office") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. [Filing No. 16 .] The Sheriff's Office seeks dismissal of the claims brought against it by Plaintiff Lee Pratt pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § ; 1983 and the state law doctrine of respondeat superior. [Filing No. 1 .] For the reasons detailed herein, the Court is GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Sheriff's Office's Motion to Dismiss and dismisses Mr. Pratt's § 19 83 claim against the Sheriff's Office. For the reasons stated herein, the Sheriff's Office's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, 16 , and Mr. Pratt's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the Sheriff's Office is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. No final judgment shall issue. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/14/2018.(APD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
