TOWNSEND v. MCWILLIAMS et al
| KIM TOWNSEND |
| CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, COOPER, JOHN DOE OFFICERS, MARION COUNTY, BRIAN MCWILLIAMS, ROSTER, TUNNEY and WATERMAN |
| 1:2017cv03024 |
| August 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Ms. Townsend's motion for reconsideration is DENIED, dkt. 125 , and Officer Jackson's supplemental motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, dkt. 126 . Final judgment will issue in a separate entry (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/30/2020. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 77 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to Defendants McWilliams, Waterman, Tunney, Roster, Cooper, Gough , and John Doe officers, who are DISMISSED; the clerk shall update the docket accordingly. The motion is DENIED as to Ms. Townsend's claim that Officer Jackson used excessive force by pulling her by the wrists or handcuffs (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/30/2019. (DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
