GOD v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON, IN et al
| GOD A/K/A MICHAEL H. WALLER |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON, IN and LILLY LIBRARY |
| 1:2017cv03028 |
| August 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
Entry Discussing Request to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperisand Motion For Leave to File Electronically - 20 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (USCA #17-03140) is denied. 21 Motion for Leave to File is denied. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/6/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
22
Entry Discussing Pending Motions and Affidavit of Income and Expenses - In light of his having no expenses and sufficient funds on hand to pay the filing fee, his request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted to the extent that he may pay the & #036;350.00 filing fee in three (3) payments of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) and a fourth payment of Fifty Dollars ($50.). He shall have through December 18, 2017, in which to pay the first One Hundred Dollar ($100.00) installment of the filing fee to the clerk of the court. The additional three payments shall be paid on or before the 18th of each month until the final payment is made. Failure to pay the filing fee as directed will result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. The plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment, dkt. 7 , is denied because the defendants are not in default. The plaintiff's motion to reconsider the requirement of p roviding a statement of income and expenses, dkt. 10 , is denied. The plaintiff's motion for relief from service of summons, dkt. 16 , is denied as meritless and premature. A filing sent to the plaintiff has returned as undeliverable. dkt. 19 . It is the plaintiff's obligation to report his current address to the Court. If the Court is unable to communicate with the plaintiff in writing because he has failed to provide a current address, the action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute. See order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/21/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
