REAVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| KEVIN REAVES |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA RICHEY, KIM STAFFORD and TAMMY TROXELL |
| 1:2017cv03374 |
| September 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ENTRY - Screening Amended Complaint and Directing Issuance and Service of Process; Mr. Reaves' claim that he was retaliated against for filing Madison County Cause No. 48c06-1701-CT-000002 shall proceed against defendant Kim Stafford. Mr. Reaves' claims against counselor Tammy Troxell and LPN Richey are dismissed for the reasons discussed above and previously in the Court's entry of January 19, 2018 (dkt. # 19). The clerk is directed to terminate from the docket Tammy Troxell and Alisha Richey as defendants in this action. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendant Kim Stafford in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint (docket 20), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/13/2018. Copies Mailed.(CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
