BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ET AL V. COOK GROUP INCORPORATED ET AL
| BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC. |
| COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC |
| BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC. |
| Sara P. Zogg |
| COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC |
| 1:2017cv03448 |
| October 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1112
ORDER deferring ruling on 1020 MOTION to Strike 1010 Witness List Objection and Motion to Strike Barry Slowey from Cook's Amended Final Trial Witness List, 1081 MOTION To Narrow Issues for Trial ; granting 1081 Motion. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 05/27/2023. (SNB)
|
|
Filing
1076
ORDER granting 995 Motion; granting 1013 Motion; denying 1031 Motion for Leave to File; granting 1033 Motion. See Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 05/22/2023. (SNB)
|
|
Filing
974
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 735 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Technical Expert, Karl Leinsing; granting in part and denying in part 740 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Patent Law Expert, S tephen Kunin; granting in part and denying in part 752 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Defendant's Damages Expert, Vincent A. Thomas; denying 760 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Damages Expert, John Bone. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 02/02/2023. (SNB) Modified on 2/2/2023 (SNB).
|
|
Filing
962
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 620 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 630 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 634 Motion. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 01/31/2023. (SNB)
|
|
Filing
956
Order on Motion to Strike - granting in part and denying in part 924 MOTION to Strike 913 Notice (Other) filed by Defendants Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §282. To avoid the above-mentioned juror confusion and to prevent the additio n of a voluminous number of references at trial, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, (ECF No. 924). All unelected patents and patent applications in the § 282 Notice are stricken. Defendants may not rel y on any of the patents and patent applications listed there (and not listed in the supplemental invalidity contentions) for any purpose. However, Defendants may rely on other non-patent publications, taking care not to burden the jury with cumulative evidence, in their Notice solely for the purpose of generally describing the state of the art. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/30/2023. (KAA)
|
|
Filing
693
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Cook Defendants' 580 Motion for Attorney Fees. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/21/2022. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
611
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS - Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Supplemental Invalidity Contentions [Dkt. 573 ] is DENIED and Defendants' Conditional Motion for Leave to Exceed a Li mit of 24 Prior Art References to the Extent the Court Finds (1) That Such a Limit Applied to Cook's December 2021 Invalidity Contentions, and (2) That Cook Exceeded This Limit [Dkt. 582 ] is GRANTED. Neither party is entitled to fees with regard to the instant motions. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 3/4/2022. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
542
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Compel 502 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall designate a witness to testify on their behalf regarding Topics 25, 26, and 29 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). *SEE ORDER.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 12/28/2021. (GD)
|
|
Filing
449
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS - Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Reassert Claim 13 of U.S. Patent No. 8,974,371 and to Amend Infringement Contentions [Dkt. 376 ] and Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend their Complaint to Assert U.S. Patent No . 9,271,731 against Cook's Newly-Launched Instinct Plus Device [Dkt. 423 ] are GRANTED. In light of this ruling, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claim Based on U.S. Patent No. 8,974,371 for Lack of Jurisdiction [Dkt. 390 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. In addition, Defendants' Motion to Strike Boston's Notice of Subsequent Events or, Alternatively, for Leave to File a Response to the Notice [Dkt. 437 ] also is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs shall serve their Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint in substantially the same form as found at [Dkt. 424 -2] within three days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their amended infringement contentions by the deadline set forth in paragraph II(B) of the approved Patent Case Management Order. [Dkt. 374 at 2.].The Court recognizes that the case management schedule may need to be modified to accommodate any additional work that will be necessitated by the amendments permitted in this Order. The Court and the parties will discuss the need for any such modification at the August 25, 2021, status conference. [See Dkt. 448 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/16/2021. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
359
ORDER ON MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND REOPEN CASE: Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay and Reopen Case [Dkt. 343 ] is DENIED. This matter will remain stayed and administratively closed pending a final decision by the Federal Circuit. Defendants' Motion Requesting Oral Argument on Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay and Reopen Case [Dkt. 354 ] is also DENIED. The record is sufficiently clear and oral arguments on the case are unnecessary to resolve the motion. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/17/2019. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
