PERKINS v JORDAN ET AL
LANCE PERKINS |
DAN GORDON and DAVID JORDAN |
1:2017cv03507 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dan Gordon's 31 motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in this Order, the motion must be granted, and all clai ms against Mr. Gordon must be dismissed. Defendant Dan Gordon's motion for summary judgment, dkt. 31 , is granted. All claims against Mr. Gordon are dismissed with prejudice, and the clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that he is no longer a defendant in this action. Mr. Perkins shall have through July 2, 2018, to show cause why the Court should not remand this action to the Miami Circuit Court on grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Perkin s's claims against Defendant David Jordan. In doing so, Mr. Perkins shall identify the state of his citizenship for purposes of establishing diversity jurisdiction. Mr. Jordan shall have through June 18, 2018, to file a declaration with the Court identifying the state of his citizenship for purposes of establishing diversity jurisdiction. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/6/2018. (APD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.