HERFF JONES, LLC v. FLIPPIN
HERFF JONES, LLC |
ELIZABETH FLIPPIN |
ELIZABETH FLIPPIN |
HERFF JONES, LLC |
1:2017cv03508 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
William T. Lawrence |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Stay Briefing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Stay Entry of Case Management Deadlines Pending Ruling on Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 20 Motion to Stay; The Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 3/9/2018 at 9:00 AM in room #202, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Judge William T. Lawrence. Discovery, briefing, and the hearing on Herff Jones's Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall proceed. Flippin's supplemental responses to the Document Requests as discussed in the Order on Discovery Dispute, including the documents themselves and a privilege log, shall now be ser ved by the close of business December 22, 2018. Herff Jones's brief in support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction is due January 15, 2018; Flippin's response is due January 29, 2018; and Herff Jones's reply is due February 5, 2018. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/18/2017. (JDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.