THURMAN v. TRUSTEE et al
United States Truste NANCY J. GARGULA, JUDGE MOBY and TRUSTEE |
SHARON LYNN THURMAN |
1:2017cv03876 |
October 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER - Appellant Sharon Lynn Thurman has a pending Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana. See In re Thurman, Bank. No. 17-01904 (Bank. S.D. Ind.). On October 12, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court granted the United States Trustee's ("the Trustee") Motion for Extension to Time to File a Complaint to Deny Discharge. [Bank. Dkt. No. 67 .] On October 25, 2017, Ms. Thurman filed in this Court a Notice of Appeal, challenging the Bankruptcy Court's order granting an extension of time. [Filing No. 1 .] Presently pending before the Court is the Trustee's Motion to Dismiss that appeal. [Filing No. 6 .] Ms. Thurman did not file a response to that Motion. For the r easons stated in this Order, the Court GRANTS the Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Ms. Thurman's appeal. [Filing No. 6 .] Final judgment shall issue separately. See Order. Copy to Appellant via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/24/2018. (APD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.