ROBERSON v. TALBOT et al
Plaintiff: PAUL ROBERSON
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES
Miscellaneous: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2017cv04110
Filed: November 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER Granting Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - A prison inmate is entitled to adequate medical care, Farmer, 511 U.S. at 832, and that is what Mr. Roberson received. An inmate cannot demand specific care and is not entitled to the best care possible. Johnson v. Doughty, 433 F.3d 1001, 1013 (7th Cir. 2006); Boyce v. Moore, 314 F.3d 884, 888-89 (7th Cir. 2004); Ralston v. McGovern, 167 F.3d 1160, 1162 (7th Cir. 1999). The undisputed summary jud gment evidence demonstrates that the defendants were not deliberately indifferent to Mr. Robersons serious medical needs. The defendants motions for summary judgment, dkt. 80 and dkt. 83 , are granted. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now enter. This action is dismissed with prejudice (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/14/2020. Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. (DWH)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Entry Directing Development of Exhaustion Defense and Issuing Partial Stay - These defendants' exhaustion defense will be resolved pursuant to the following schedule. Dr. Paul Talbot and Wexford Health Services shall have through April 26, 20 18, in which to either: file a dispositive motion in support of the exhaustion defense; file a notice with the Court specifically identifying the fact issue(s) that preclude resolution of this affirmative defense via a dispositive motion and reque sting a Pavey hearing; or file a notice with the Court withdrawing the exhaustion defense. The failure to pursue any of these options by the above deadline constitutes an abandonment of the exhaustion defense. If a dispositive motion is filed, plaintiff shall have twenty-eight (28) days in which to respond. Defendants shall then have fourteen (14) days in which to reply. Except for activities associated with the development and resolution of defendants' affirmative defense that pl aintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this action, or any other matter directed by the Court, any other activities or deadlines in the action are stayed. Discovery on the issue of exhaustion is allowed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/1/2018. (MEJ)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENTRY - 12 Motion to Amend/Correct is granted. The clerk is directed to file the tendered attachment, dkt. 12-1, as plaintiff's first amended complaint. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to def endants Dr. Paul Talbot, Wexford Health Sources, and Corizon Medical Services in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/10/2018. (Dr. Paul Talbot, Wexford Medical Services, and Corizon Medical Services) (MEJ)
December 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENTRY - The motion to amend the complaint, dkt. 8 , and motion for class certification, dkt. 9 , are DENIED. Plaintiff Paul Roberson has through January 29, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint containing only his claims and no other plaintiffs, or to inform the Court he will proceed with the November 6, 2017, complaint as the operative complaint. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/28/2017. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBERSON v. TALBOT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL TALBOT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAUL ROBERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?