STUMM et al v. TOWN OF PITTSBORO
| BRIAN T HELMER, JASON A STUMM and MATTHEW W STUMM |
| LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING, CHRISTI PATTERSON, TOWN OF PITTSBORO and CARRIE WEBER |
| 1:2017cv04296 |
| November 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER - The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Matt Stumm's Bill of Costs, 91 . The Court also GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Matt Stumm's Petition for Attorneys' Fees, 93 , as discussed in the Order. Therefore, costs in the total amount of $1,249.27 are taxed against Christi Patterson and the Town of Pittsboro, and Matt Stumm is awarded $69,043.50 in attorneys' fees from those Defendants, consisting of $64,770 to counsel Jeff McQuary and $4,273.50 to counsel Alexander Van Gorp, in addition to the previously-entered judgment for $15,000 in damages. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/17/2019. (JDH)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER - On June 18, 2019, the Court concluded a jury trial in this matter and ordered the parties to submit further briefing as to the form of judgment. [Filing No. 83.] The parties have done so, and the issue is now ripe for the Court's conside ration. For the reasons set forth in the Order, the Court will enter final judgment in the amount of $15,000.00 in favor of Mr. Stumm and against Defendants Christi Patterson and the Town of Pittsboro. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/15/2019.(JDH)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 41 Motion for Summary Judgment, as follows: (1) the Motion is GRANTED as to Mr. Helmer's claims against Defendants; (2) the Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claims against Ca ptain Carri Weber; and (3) the Motion is otherwise DENIED. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties at his earliest convenience regarding a possible resolution of these remaining matters, short of trial. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/14/2018. (JDH)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - The Plaintiffs in this case - Matthew Stumm, Jason Stumm, and Brian Helmer - are current or former Pittsboro Police officers who allege that the Chief of Police and a Police Major recorded their conversations without their knowledge and wi thout a court order in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Relatedly, Plaintiffs allege that Carri Weber, a Captain with the Plainfield Police Department, violated the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510, et seq., wh en she used and disclosed the recorded conversations while conducting an investigation into alleged misconduct on the part of Matthew Stumm. Presently pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Captain Weber. [Filing No. 12 .] For t he reasons that follow, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For the reasons explained herein, Captain Weber's Motion to Dismiss 12 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: (1) the Motion is GRANTED as to Mr. Helmer and Jason Stumm, and their claims against her are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and (2) the Motion is DENIED as to Matthew Stumm's claim. Plaintiffs have thirty days to move to amend their Complaint if they intend to continue to pursue the cl aims that have been dismissed without prejudice. Failure to file an amended complaint within this time period will result in a dismissal WITH PREJUDICE with respect to such claims. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/8/2018. (APD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
