RHODES v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
| PAULA RHODES |
| ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC |
| 1:2017cv04297 |
| November 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; This cause is now before the Court on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment [Dkt. Nos. 89 and 91 , both filed on September 30, 2019. The parties' cross-motions are GRANTED IN PAR T and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment Dkt. 89 is GRANTED as to their claim brought pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)(2) and DENIED as to their 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e and 1692f claims. Defendant's M otion for Summary Judgment Dkt. 91 is correspondingly DENIED as to Plaintiffs' § 1692g(a)(2) claim and GRANTED as to their §§ 1692e and 1692f claims. On April 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Dkt. 108 . Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff's motion. That motion is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/21/2020. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER - granting 32 Motion to Certify Class *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/19/2018. (CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
