DOUGHTY v. DUGGER et al

Plaintiff: ANTONIO DOUGHTY
Defendant: ARAMARK, JODY DUGGER and BRANDEN HESTER
Miscellaneous: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 1:2017cv04470
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 7, 2018 34 Opinion or Order of the Court Entry Granting Summary Judgment and Directing Final Judgment - Plaintiff Antonio Doughty was an Indiana prisoner who was at all relevant times confined at Plainfield Correctional Facility ("Plainfield"). The Court screened his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and determined that Equal Protection claims, a retaliation claim, and a Title VII claim could proceed against various defendants. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on their affirmative defense that M r. Doughty failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Mr. Doughty did not respond to the defendants' motion, and the time to do so has passed. For the reasons explained in this Entry, the defendants' unopposed motion for summary judg ment is granted, and Mr. Doughty's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Doughty's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. (See Entry). Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/7/2018. (APD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DOUGHTY v. DUGGER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JODY DUGGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRANDEN HESTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTONIO DOUGHTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?