DOUGHTY v. DUGGER et al
| ANTONIO DOUGHTY |
| ARAMARK, JODY DUGGER and BRANDEN HESTER |
| PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv04470 |
| December 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
Entry Granting Summary Judgment and Directing Final Judgment - Plaintiff Antonio Doughty was an Indiana prisoner who was at all relevant times confined at Plainfield Correctional Facility ("Plainfield"). The Court screened his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and determined that Equal Protection claims, a retaliation claim, and a Title VII claim could proceed against various defendants. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on their affirmative defense that M r. Doughty failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Mr. Doughty did not respond to the defendants' motion, and the time to do so has passed. For the reasons explained in this Entry, the defendants' unopposed motion for summary judg ment is granted, and Mr. Doughty's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Doughty's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. (See Entry). Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/7/2018. (APD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
