MELTON v. BERRYHILL
| ROSE M. MELTON |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
| SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv04672 |
| December 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L. Young |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation ECF No. 16 - On February 21, 2019, Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch issued her Report and Recommendation on Complaint for Judicial Review, finding that the Administrative Law Judge's step three analysis of Rose M.'s cervical spine impairment is not supported by substantial evidence. ECF No. 16 . The parties had an opportunity to file objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); none were filed. The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the parties' briefs, and the administrative record, adopts the Report and Recommendation ECF No. 16 . The Court concludes that the ALJ's decision is not supported by substantial evidenc e and should be reversed and remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Fi-nal judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/12/2019.(JDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
