CAVIUM, INC. v. IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
Plaintiff: CAVIUM, INC.
Defendant: IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
Case Number: 1:2017mc00070
Filed: October 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAVIUM, INC. v. IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAVIUM, INC.
Represented By: Karineh Khachatourian
Represented By: Megan Whyman Olesek
Represented By: Robert J. Schuckit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
Represented By: Alexander Pape Orlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?