HIPPS v. BIGLARI HOLDINGS, INC. et al
JOSEPH HIPPS |
BIGLARI HOLDINGS, INC., PHILIP L. COOLEY, KENNETH R. COOPER, JAMES P. MASTRIAN, RUTH J. PERSON and SARDAR BIGLARI |
1:2018cv00349 |
February 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 CLOSED REMANDED to Hamilton County Superior Court;, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Motion to Remand filed by JOSEPH HIPPS, 57 Report and Recommendations. The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plain tiff's Motion for Remand. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections. On April 12, 2018, parties filed a Consent to Remand and Withdrawal of Pending Motions (dkt. 65 ). The C ourt, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the parties' consent, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. All pending motions in this matter are DENIED as MOOT, and this case is remanded to Hamilton County Superior Court 1. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/13/2018.(MAC) Copies mailed to addressed parties in distribution of this Order. Modified on 4/13/2018 (MAC). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.