BUNNELL v. BUTTS et al
| RODERICK BUNNELL |
| KEITH BUTTS, GIBSON and JENNY GIBSON |
| 1:2018cv00772 |
| March 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Filing of Amended Complaint - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 3 , is granted. He is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Fifty Cents ($9. 50). He shall have through April 18, 2018, to pay this sum to the clerk. The plaintiff's motion for assistance with recruiting counsel, Dkt. No. 2 is denied as premature. The filing fee has not been paid, the complaint has not been screened , and the defendants have not been served. Defendant Ms. Gibson, as the mail room supervisor, is also dismissed as a defendant. Defendant Keith Butts is dismissed as a defendant. The dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiffs shall have through April 18, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint. (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/15/2018. (JDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
