BELL v. IMPROVE MY CREDIT FITNESS LLC
RICHARD N. BELL |
IMPROVE MY CREDIT FITNESS LLC and INTEGRITY WHOLESALE FURNITURE, LLC |
1:2018cv01162 |
April 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 504 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 ORDER on Motion for Attorneys' Fees - Therefore, the Court finds that Integrity's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, (ECF No. 100), should be, and hereby is, denied (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/28/2022. (DWH) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. Final judgment will issue in a separate order. ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 4/5/2021. (JDC) |
Filing 70 Entry Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - Defendant Integrity Wholesale Furniture, LLC moves to dismiss this copyright infringement case for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Def.'s Mot. Dismiss 1, ECF No. 61.) Plaintiff responds that Defendant waived its personal-jurisdiction defense. (Pl.'s Resp. 1-3, ECF No. 66.). Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction ECF No. 61 is denied. ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/3/2019. (JDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.