LOWDER v. TALBOT et al
| CURT LOWDER |
| LAFLOWER and PAUL TALBOT |
| 1:2018cv01216 |
| April 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Matthew P. Brookman |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER - granting Defendants' 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated above, the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 33 , is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/19/2020. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER - denying 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Because Mr. Lowder has not shown that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction by meeting any of the three threshold requirements, see Valencia, 883 F.3d at 966, his motion for a preliminary injunction, dkt. 18 , is denied. (See Order. ) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/29/2019. (NAD)
|
|
Filing
14
Entry Directing Development of Exhaustion Defense and Issuing Partial Stay - The defendants' exhaustion defense will be resolved pursuant to the following schedule. The defendants shall have through September 5, 2018, in which to either: file a dispositive motion in support of the exhaustion defense; file a notice with the Court specifically identifying the fact issue(s) that preclude resolution of this affirmative defense via a dispositive motion and requesting a Pavey hearing; or fi le a notice with the Court withdrawing the exhaustion defense. The failure to pursue any of these options by the above deadline constitutes an abandonment of the exhaustion defense. If a dispositive motion is filed, the plaintiff shall have twenty- eight (28) days in which to respond. The defendants shall then have fourteen (14) days in which to reply. Except for activities associated with the development and resolution of the defendants' affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing this action, or any other matter directed by the Court, any other activities or deadlines in the action are stayed. Dispositive Motions due by 9/5/2018. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/23/2018.(NAD) Modified on 7/24/2018 - Updated for administrative purposes(NAD).
|
|
Filing
7
Entry Screening Complaint and Directing Service of Process - The plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Dr. Talbot and Ms. LaFlower shall proceed. This summary of claims includes all of the viable claims identified by the Court. I f the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court he shall have through July 2, 2018, in which to identify those claims. The pro se plaintiff shall report any change of address within te n (10) days of any change. The Court must be able to locate the plaintiff to communicate with him. If the plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his or her current address, the action may be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with C ourt orders and failure to prosecute. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the defendants Dr. Talbot and Ms. LaFlower in the manner specified by Rule 4 (d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed on April 23, 2018, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (See Entry.). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/25/2018.(NAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
